Myth and Mythology in Georges Dumézil

This question might arise for any reader familiar with mythology or, more broadly, methodology in general: why should we 21st-century inhabitants focus on the life and theory of a figure belonging to the 20th century? Despite the dozens of diverse theories developed during this time, why is it necessary to engage with theories like those of Dumézil, Campbell, or Frazer? Is it because these theories are part of the history of mythology and every society must know them to avoid a historical gap or deficiency in this field? Such a gap could cause fundamental shortcomings in research within this domain. Or is it because these theories remain useful and can still be applied to certain mythological studies? A complete answer to these questions, at least regarding Georges Dumézil, can only be found by writing and reading books like this one—works that deal with this figure and his views comprehensively, extensively, and deeply. This importance becomes especially clear when his methodology is assessed in relation to contemporary works. It is worth noting that Georges Dumézil was a multifaceted figure among great scholars. He was a linguist, mythologist, and a researcher of religions and civilizations, particularly Indo-European religions and civilizations. Nevertheless, his most significant scientific attribute was his mythology. He is considered one of the most prominent mythologists of the 20th century and, overall, in the history of mythological knowledge, leaving a profound impact on this science, especially comparative mythology.